(7) After the jurors were discharged, several members of the jury met with attorney Michael G. (6) After m isleading the parties and attorneys as to the circumstances affecting the jury’s deliberations, Judge Cogan falsely declared that the jury was deadlocked and then declared a mistrial. 325, at page 14), thereby deceiving the parties and attorneys.
(5) After Judge Cogan received a written jury note indicating that the conscientious objector was refusing to deliberate (See Altered Jury Note, Court Exhibit 8), Judge Cogan physically alter ed the note’s written Against NYC DefendantsĬontent and then read into the record a different message than what was later found to be in the note (See T ranscript, Doc. (4) After receiv ing a written jury note indicating that one juror was a conscientious objector, Judge Cogan physically altered the note’s written content to hide that fact from the attorneys and parties (See Altered Jury N ote, Court Exhib it 7). 282) that the jury would continue to deliberate and reach a verdict with five jurors or less (See T ranscript, Doc. (3) After learning from a written jury note that two of seven jurors had travel plans, Judge Cogan excused the City from its prior written agreement (See Agreement for Verdict by Jury of Less Than Six Members, Doc. (2) After the jurors signaled in written jury notes that they were moving toward a plaintiff’s verdict, Judge Cogan signaled to the City that it should try to settle the case before the jury could reach a decision, while simultaneously trying to convince the plaintiffs that the jury was go ing the other way (See Transcript, Doc.
0 kommentar(er)
